-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 9/23/13 10:03 AM, Dave Cridland wrote: > On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Peter Saint-Andre > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > >> Many header fields include "[CWFS]" (folding whitespace with >> optional comments) instead of "[FWS]". For simplicity of parsing >> I would avoid using these, unless needed. But if you choose to >> use [CFWS], that would still be fine. > > Personally I see no need to allow comments. Keep it simple. > > > Comments are traditional. Besides, we don't want just anyone able > to write a parser, so we? > > Seriously, comments aren't much of a bother to deal with unless > they're in the (like this) middle of something else you're trying > to parse, but on the other hand they rarely add value.
Right. But if they're traditional, what is the traditional syntax to handle them? ;-) Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.19 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJSQG0IAAoJEOoGpJErxa2pe0AP/2xkwmIb+kEsQBHkqhqMP8sF +zrlrEk/xx3JZLFWUJs4vB9q6Oer30vtd/GXgPK3RfGxvyPaUNX2CjOUwhCUsc2e kZAiCTaoBERFqUNuYOxOAT70T5rHatTXrKsJfezb+OBBHdDPO4x94P9E5SMl21M0 Fj1JfKde0MkXkc/24tgG3uPfZAbeHdufB4/TAy6u8YrcQonZ1uzV9dUOD8NZ2X0m bbM5XwL3isyDEP9X17xJe89ce38owvGLCnkcbQLYsKiIB604CBgByfEKOJ08/K3g LN+sWI3YVAjJh29dOg7m1mU1fBbc+QLb9HVVf5Uv0ZVrZlvZzuiShlI96bOiVSMu fQGlQiT2EesJXJI5YsEnSL5skQlE5c7kMPC/wazP2TeQCVonqPVQdhHSH4qNhjpR QGF/2LL8uG35qM14u2jkC5IOaXxV5p0qUlrPL6J8/rlAIW3bUijLCLEdIYwHt835 oBMLShNzfJx6rr9RtvQuKEef3CqksJPul+fzTidcnQx64cqKW6Fyn7vfbfzmTVr5 ba0NhZ106+qL8GDvXBKpFDwAaQMldR2AZxPmoejQlBKErK6ooPGtOFWOPyHfMLN7 WXjdsh+KQNpMCZKJmFUJLK7LTy9QSSCGnxiO++OzYt84y67cKpG/vmLVxgQt97rN pw6iT4UTkoCWyvF8t0qu =IVB5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
