On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 01:04:25PM +0000, Dave Cridland wrote: > On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 1:01 PM, Carlo v. Loesch <[email protected]>wrote: > > > If you don't accept social graph protection as a more important > > priority than interoperability, > > "Interoperability" is a posh word for "works".
So you mean Tor is interoperable, although just with itself? Probably true. The discussion arose because Mr Kuckartz insists on thinking that graph-protecting communication systems MUST be XMPP compatible just because it's there, whereas I think it would (1) not motivate XMPP users to upgrade to a higher degree of privacy and at the same time (2) give the new users a false sense of security when the XMPP gateway is actually leaking their social graph, thus not fulfilling the promise it gave. I think I agree with you. I think graph-protecting software like Pond is very well interoperable with itself. :)
