Thu, 05 Dec 2013 01:05:50 +0100 Alexander Holler <[email protected]> wrote:
> Yes, they don't care, but a XMPP-server has to care about, as the > server should refuse not-wellformed stanzas. So feeding it with the > initial <stream:stream> might result in a problem (not hard to avoid, > but still ugly). > > Another ugly thing are those stream restarts, they don't fit very > well into the XML syntax too: > > "The initiating entity MUST send a new initial stream header to the > receiving entity over the encrypted connection (as specified under > Section 4.3.3, the initiating entity MUST NOT send a closing > </stream> tag before sending the new initial stream header, since the > receiving entity and initiating entity MUST consider the original > stream to be replaced upon success of the TLS negotiation)." That's XMPP as it is: if something can be done by hands it will be done by hands :) There are no problems in XMPP. Oh wait... The only problem is TLS in virtual hosting. Let's invent 3 specs to solve it :)
