I have some requests :
Change:
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>
The protocol documented by this schema is defined in
XEP-xxxx: http://www.xmpp.org/extensions/xep-xxxx.html
</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
to
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>
The protocol documented by this schema is defined in
XEP-xxxx: http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-xxxx.html
</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>------- Change: This XMPP Extension Protocol has been contributed in full conformance with the XSF's Intellectual Property Rights Policy (a copy of which may be found at <http://www.xmpp.org/extensions/ipr-policy.shtml> or obtained by writing to XSF, P.O. Box 1641, Denver, CO 80201 USA). to This XMPP Extension Protocol has been contributed in full conformance with the XSF's Intellectual Property Rights Policy (a copy of which may be found at <http://xmpp.org/extensions/ipr-policy.shtml> or obtained by writing to XSF, P.O. Box 1641, Denver, CO 80201 USA). ------- Note for example "In accordance with Section 10 of XEP-0166, this document specifies the following information related to the Jingle DTLS/SCTP transport method:" (and others) : XEP-0166 are not linked: http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0166.html. Regards, Ludovic Le 06/01/2014 22:57, XMPP Extensions Editor a écrit : > The XMPP Extensions Editor has received a proposal for a new XEP. > > Title: Use of DTLS/SCTP in Jingle ICE-UDP > > Abstract: This specification defines how to use the ICE-UDP Jingle transport > method to send media data using WebRTC DataChannels, so technically uses > DTLS/SCTP on top of the Interactive Connectivity Establishment (ICE) > methodology, which provides robust NAT traversal for media traffic. > > URL: http://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/jingle-dtls.html > > The XMPP Council will decide in the next two weeks whether to accept this > proposal as an official XEP. > > >
smime.p7s
Description: Signature cryptographique S/MIME
