On 1/8/14 11:33 AM, Ludovic BOCQUET wrote: > I have some requests : IMHO it's a waste of list bandwidth to discuss nits like these.
> Change: > <xs:annotation> > <xs:documentation> > The protocol documented by this schema is defined in > XEP-xxxx: http://www.xmpp.org/extensions/xep-xxxx.html > </xs:documentation> > </xs:annotation> > to > <xs:annotation> > <xs:documentation> > The protocol documented by this schema is defined in > XEP-xxxx: http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-xxxx.html > </xs:documentation> > </xs:annotation> In fact we don't add those annotations until a specification is advanced to Draft. > Change: > This XMPP Extension Protocol has been contributed in full conformance > with the XSF's Intellectual Property Rights Policy (a copy of which may > be found at <http://www.xmpp.org/extensions/ipr-policy.shtml> or > obtained by writing to XSF, P.O. Box 1641, Denver, CO 80201 USA). > to > This XMPP Extension Protocol has been contributed in full conformance > with the XSF's Intellectual Property Rights Policy (a copy of which may > be found at <http://xmpp.org/extensions/ipr-policy.shtml> or obtained by > writing to XSF, P.O. Box 1641, Denver, CO 80201 USA). That comes from xep-template.xml, which I've just modified. > Note for example "In accordance with Section 10 of XEP-0166, this > document specifies the following information related to the Jingle > DTLS/SCTP transport method:" (and others) : > XEP-0166 are not linked: http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0166.html. I'm sure that will be fixed before publication as a XEP. Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
