Hi all. As Peter mentions in LinkedIn thread https://www.linkedin.com/groupItem?view=&item=5862110582659891202&type=member&gid=49429
"If you don't have the full JID of the sensor, you can publish a <set> command (XEP-0325) to a node on a pubsub server, instead of embedding it in a <message> or <iq> stanza to the sensor. If the sensor subscribes to the node, it will receive the set command and perform the action." Has anyone defined best practises for such or will them be defined in the next version of XEP-0325? I could see pubsub very useful in use cases when there are, e.g., one million sensors that require the same command to be executed as fast as possible. So they all just get the command from a pubsub node right after they come online, but what would be the best mechanism to tell this node to all the sensors? Happy Easter. -Teemu 2014-04-07 23:53 GMT+03:00 XMPP Extensions Editor <[email protected]>: > Version 0.3 of XEP-0325 (Internet of Things - Control) has been released. > > Abstract: This specification describes how to control devices or actuators in > an XMPP-based sensor network. > > Changelog: [See revision history] (pw) > > Diff: http://xmpp.org/extensions/diff/api/xep/0325/diff/0.2/vs/0.3 > > URL: http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0325.html >
