On 06/23/2014 05:01 PM, Philipp Hancke wrote: > Am 23.06.2014 09:41, schrieb Sergey Dobrov: >> So guys, what are the exact concern around the XEP-0033 > > None of us has ever seen 0033 deliver on "reducing the amount of s2s > traffic". Even the authors of 0033 agreed to this in the repeater > introduction. But it seems to be obvious to me that one event, even with overhead on XEP-33 semantic will have less weight that multiple events, especially on big nodes, huh?
> > Using 0033 unconditionally has trust issues. How do you avoid the > spammer that just puts a bunch of addresses there? You need to do heavy > checks on each use here -- which is why reusing lists may have > advantages, as you need to do those checks less (which depends on the > usecase however). How to avoid to spam each person individually? > >> and what should I use instead? I did not get your points. > > Ignore 0033 for now. > I have not heard any else concerns but I do have some -1's, so I am not sure what should I do next with the proposal? Thanks. -- With best regards, Sergey Dobrov, XMPP Developer and JRuDevels.org founder.
