I didn't get exactly what legal issue we are facing here ? Like the
fact that Github will own the sourcecode ? We can, maybe, look for our
own tracker system like Gitlab yes :)
Maybe we can talk about that during the next summit ?
For the Wiki cleaning, I cannot delete the existent pages, there's no
clear link to do that on the wiki. Can someone tell me why or explain
me how to do this ?
edhelas
On lun., sept. 1, 2014 at 8:03 , Steven Lloyd Watkin
<[email protected]> wrote:
Whilst I agree with you entirely (we could also use Travis to test
patches are valid and publish / updated the website) I believe there
are some potential legal issues that have come up previously.
I *think* the latest gitlab has public repositories but this does not
allow for the fork + pull request model we are all used to with
github.
On 1 Sep 2014 18:37, "edhelas" <[email protected]> wrote:
Yes I was just thinking of Github too.
The "pull request" feature is also really nice for :
- Fixing minor issues (typo, english mistake…)
- Proposing improvements for the XEP (changes that require major
version update). Then we can decide that for such request we talk
about it during the meeting.
The current process (with the "inbox" and the validations) can also
be changed to a more modern one, linked with the bugtracker/feature
system :)
On lun., sept. 1, 2014 at 7:25 , Evgeny Khramtsov
<[email protected]> wrote:
Mon, 1 Sep 2014 19:08:22 +0200
Christian Schudt <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi,
I appreciate the idea to introduce an issue tracker for XEPs (like
Jira).
It would be way much easier to move XEPs to github and use the
corresponding github's bug tracker.
