On 9/24/14, 9:34 AM, Hund, Johannes wrote:
Wow, finally some more „exotic” M2M use cases. Sounds interesting your
project!
In terms of message load I could think tigase might be also be worth a
look – it has downsides on configurability and extensibility from what
I’ve heard though.
I see that certain pattern, and maybe it would be good to have a Matrix
of the brokers with some infos like scalability in terms of user count ,
scalability in terms of message load on the other column, clustering,
ease of configuration, code base maturity, etc.
Or maybe just extend the present on xmpp.org in terms of ‘”primary
design goals”.
Would you think that to be senseful or just me asking for a flamewar?
Mostly just asking for a flamewar. It is difficult to sort truth from
fancy (or marketing claims). It is also difficult to find people who
will keep the information objective and up to date.
Peter
