On 7 December 2014 at 12:31, Kevin Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
> I propose we roll back the sentinel and iq result handling to where they > were originally, and have the iq terminate the results, either with a > result (success) or error (failure). > I agree. Partly because I think it's simpler in this case, and partly because as a general protocol pattern, I would prefer <iq get/set> -> <some payload stanzas> -> <iq result/error>, and I believe this is what our current patterns are. Dave.
