On 14 Jan 2015, at 19:51, Matthew Wild <[email protected]> wrote: > I am also in favour of the original protocol (iq result to signal end > of result set), but also I feel like the behaviour Joe described is a > perfectly reasonable thing to do, and XEP-0313 would be a singular > problem for it.
I don’t think that’s true. There’s no guarantee of immediate response on any iq, and although in most cases responses will be ~= immediate, there are several that are likely to involve callouts to external services, disk reads and waiting for responses in the same way as MAM. /K
