On 02.04.2015 10:08, Dave Cridland wrote: > On 1 April 2015 at 18:33, Matthew Wild <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > On 1 April 2015 at 17:37, Dave Cridland <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > It is also not clear to me what, exactly, the "more" consists > of. I have heard: > > - Reflection of messages to the source. > > > I think this only really makes sense in XEP-0280. > > > ... > <feature var='urn:xmpp:carbons:2'/> > <feature var='urn:xmpp:carbons:advanced:0'/> > ... > > <iq type='set'> > <enable xmlns='urn:xmpp:carbons:2' > adv:xmlns='urn:xmpp:carbons:advanced:0'> > <adv:reflection/>
After giving it more thought I'm really undecided if I think it's better to have this in carbons (xep280) or as extra XEP. But I think, given that carbons is still experimental, and maybe soon deferred, I personally would add this feature to the carbons XEP and not as extra XEP. > - Addition of MAM identifiers. > This can (and should) be a separate XEP. > <adv:archive-id/> Noooo, IMHO message IDs are orthogonal to carbons and especially not a feature of carbons. A few people incl myself think more of something like http://geekplace.eu/xeps/xep-mid/xep-mid.html. > - Other types beyond 'chat'. Seems to be something we want to have. And I would tend to put this into the carbons XEP too. > There is one more item, switching from <private/> to XEP-0334 > Message Processing Hints. Don't care, as I see, in this specific case, neither a big advantage in re-using existing XEPs for carbon's private semantic, nor an disadvantage. - Florian
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
