On 2 April 2015 at 11:07, Kevin Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2 Apr 2015, at 10:16, Matthew Wild <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> - Other types beyond 'chat'. >>> >>> Seems to be something we want to have. And I would tend to put this into >>> the carbons XEP too. >> >> I'm undecided about this. I think we could get away with just saying >> that normal+chat should be copied. > > What was agreed at the summit (I’m hoping the minutes for that present > themselves soon!) was that carbons would be tied in to MAM. So that if your > server supports MAM, you’d get Carbons for whatever was going to be stored in > the archive - this could be based on the payloads of the message, and might > or might not include type=groupchat, depending on whether those go into MAM. > So it’s not quite as simple (if we still want to do what was discussed at the > Summit) as just saying ‘type=chat and type=normal’.
Hmm, I don't know about that. Fippo's case is for forking messages you typically don't want stored. Also we have no-storage separate from no-copy in XEP-0334. Regards, Matthew
