On 06/20/2015 09:41 PM, Daniel Gultsch wrote: > out of curiosity does this mean you are working on implementing jingle > file transfer 0.16 in gajim? >
I was looking at it, but this would cause a regression in 2 of our features: ability to re-request a file in hash is wrong and our file sharing plugin (that is a work in progress for the moment) That will also break compatibility with clients that supports only :3 namespace, but currently we don't work with clients that have :4 namespace implemented. implementing several version of a protocol is quite complexe. -- Yann
