While we're on the subject, is there any benefit to having a reestablish mechanism in a more general sense? I'm thinking about the number of times I tell colleagues that I'll call them right back - would we save much effort in negotiation if we chose to repeat a previous session rather than create a new one?
In this specific case, I don't see that jingle pub provides the same semantic, without considerable effort and fiddling. On 20 Jun 2015 13:09, "Yann Leboulanger" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > I just read the version 0.16 of Jingle File Transfer XEP, and saw that > you removed the <request> flow. > Just to mention that it is used in Gajim to re-request the file at the > end of a tranfer when hash was wrong. > I don't think it's a good thing to removed a feature without a > replacement, that's not very nice for clients to remove a feature they > implemented. > Please note also that this <request> thing was used by XEP-0329 that is > now no more implementable! > > Is there a way to have it back in the XEP or have a replacement XEP for > that feature? > > -- > Yann > >
