I think this has already been discussed once, but wouldn't it be more intuitive 
to use IQ semantics for this instead of sending a message which confirms the 
(de)activation?

CSI feels similar to XEP-0186: Invisible Command and it uses IQ as well. I'd 
just appreciate consistency among XEPs and CSI sticks out here.

-- Christian


> I've talked to Matt at the Summit this year about a message notification
> send by the server to the client indicating a successful CSI state
> change. We agreed on the change and I sent a patch to Matt a while ago.
> But the patch was not applied since then. I've created a PR now:
> https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/34

Reply via email to