On 28.07.2015 10:22, Christian Schudt wrote: > I think this has already been discussed once, but wouldn't it be more > intuitive to use IQ semantics for this instead of sending a message which > confirms the (de)activation?
I think Matt's intention is that stream behavior should not be controlled by Stanzas. Just like it's done by SM. I also had the opinion in the past. But more recently I'm starting to believe that using IQs would be better, since it allows us to keep the CSI state on resumption without having to add extra conditions for the resumption case to CSI (like that CSI always is active after <resumed/>). Also the IQ result could take the place of the CSI state change notification message. - Florian
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
