On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Florian Schmaus <[email protected]> wrote: > The Carbons XEP is not yet ready to advance in my opinion: The open > issues of xep280 haven't been addressed since the last try to advance > carbons in April 2015: > http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/2015-April/029709.html
That discussion effectively stalled, this is to start it back up. I don't think any of these problems need "fixing", and the ending of that discussion was effectively that MAM would be a replacement eventually. This makes me think that we should go ahead and advance carbons for now (I don't think it needs to do anythihng extra, personally), and then we can superceded it if/when MAM actually supports the same use case. My argument is effectively that carbons works right now, and it works well. If we want it to become more widely deployed, we should move it forward. If we think there are changes that need to be made or that it doesn't work, we should make those changes, but I don't think this is the case, and I fail to be convinced by any of the arguments in the old discussion. —Sam -- Sam Whited pub 4096R/54083AE104EA7AD3 https://blog.samwhited.com
