On 18 Aug 2015, at 12:57, Kurt Zeilenga <[email protected]> wrote: > Are we being asked to comment on this XEP with or without the pending PRs > applied?
Technically, it should be on the published version of 280. However, given that there are pending PRs reflecting what seems to be community concensus (and that at least some of Council will -1 advancement as-is without them applied), that seems redundant and I’d suggest commenting on the version including PRs. /K > > — Kurt > >> On Aug 13, 2015, at 1:18 PM, XMPP Extensions Editor <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> This message constitutes notice of a Last Call for comments on XEP-0280 >> (Message Carbons). >> >> Abstract: In order to keep all IM clients for a user engaged in a >> conversation, outbound messages are carbon-copied to all interested >> resources. >> >> URL: http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0280.html >> >> This Last Call begins today and shall end at the close of business on >> 2015-08-28. >> >> Please consider the following questions during this Last Call and send your >> feedback to the [email protected] discussion list: >> >> 1. Is this specification needed to fill gaps in the XMPP protocol stack or >> to clarify an existing protocol? >> 2. Does the specification solve the problem stated in the introduction and >> requirements? >> 3. Do you plan to implement this specification in your code? If not, why not? >> 4. Do you have any security concerns related to this specification? >> 5. Is the specification accurate and clearly written? >> >> Your feedback is appreciated! >
