On 23 Jun 2016, at 15:02, Sam Whited <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 2:49 AM, Florian Schmaus <[email protected]> wrote: >> I also still think that we should clarify somewhere if the carbons state >> is kept after a stream resumption or not [1]. Not sure if the right >> place for this would be xep280 or xep198. > > I think the place for this is in Stream Management (0198) Looking > beyond carbons, the act of resuming a stream should not change the > properties of that stream (in my mind). We should effectively be > "picking up where we left off", which would include features that were > negotiated inside the stream (like carbons). This does mean that the > client and the server both have to maintain state during a > reconnection event, but that doesn't seem unreasonable to me.
This sounds right, to me. /K _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
