On 12 October 2015 at 13:15, Vitaly Takmazov <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Take a look at the list of RFC and XEP authors for starters. > That list is VERY short. And most authors have 15+ years of experience > in related technologies. > Indeed, there are some extensions from "beginners" but they are not > widely adopted. > > > subscription for new ones to be written based on their requirements. > "Subscription fee" for writing an XEP is **the time**. I don't think you understood this. > As I described > in previous message - > it is cheaper to write some domain-specific protocol from scratch, > rather than adopt XMPP in that current outdated state. > What is your suggested solution to making XMPP easier to contribute to? > > open-source entitlement. > I have mention that now is 2015 - "you should use XMPP just because it > is driven by open community" > is not an answer in 2015: there are MANY open communities with open > specs and opensource libraries. > XMPP still lost it 2003. > --- >
