Four comments: 1) Council is currently in haïtus until a new Council is elected in a week and a bit, so this cannot be adopted as a XEP quite yet.
2) I'm a little concerned that this may be somewhat out of scope for the XSF; in particular, it might be better discussed within the IETF and reformulated as an Internet Draft (and ultimately an RFC). I can tell you how to go about that if you like. 3) While I don't have any objection to _tls (in fact, I think it'd be cleaner) it looks like current protocols have used variants on the "_sips" naming instead. RFC 6186 is another case in point that I'd forgotten about until I looked. So while I think this is probably the better design, I think it'd be better to match other protocol usage. 4) I'm not entirely sure about the recommended usage of SNI and ALPN here; I need to think about that one. I appreciate the SNI hack, but it *is* a hack... And my internal jury is still out on ALPN. On 5 November 2015 at 17:45, Travis Burtrum <[email protected]> wrote: > This proposal defines a procedure to look up _tls SRV records in > addition to _tcp and mix weights/priorities. > > Rendered version can be found at https://burtrum.org/xeps/tls-srv.html > > This discussion was already started on a github pull request here: > https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/116 > but was requested to be brought up on this list. > > I do have a POC implementation written up for Conversations here: > https://github.com/siacs/Conversations/pull/1371 >
