On 5 July 2016 at 10:10, Kevin Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > On 5 Jul 2016, at 09:51, Florian Schmaus <[email protected]> wrote: > > XEP development behind closed doors is not desirable. > > To be fair, that isn’t what’s happening here, it’s just that Steve wants > to double-check that the text reflects the Summit agreements before he > submits. > > One could solve this by maintaining a branch (as a "working" PR) while the double-checking happens, for example. Plus, at this point, everyone will have forgotten the precise details of the Summit discussion anyway; publish-and-be-damned seems like a fine idea to me.
I'd note that I don't think this is XEP development "behind closed doors" as such, but I do think it's not using the community to its fullest, and thus not being as open as it could be, and this does yield some discomfort - whether that's fair or not is something of a moot point. > /K > _______________________________________________ > Standards mailing list > Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards > Unsubscribe: [email protected] > _______________________________________________ >
_______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
