On 5 Jul 2016, at 10:22, Dave Cridland <[email protected]> wrote: > On 5 July 2016 at 10:10, Kevin Smith <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 5 Jul 2016, at 09:51, Florian Schmaus <[email protected]> wrote: >> > XEP development behind closed doors is not desirable. >> >> To be fair, that isn’t what’s happening here, it’s just that Steve wants to >> double-check that the text reflects the Summit agreements before he submits. >> > > One could solve this by maintaining a branch (as a "working" PR) while the > double-checking happens, for example. Plus, at this point, everyone will have > forgotten the precise details of the Summit discussion anyway; > publish-and-be-damned seems like a fine idea to me. > > I'd note that I don't think this is XEP development "behind closed doors" as > such, but I do think it's not using the community to its fullest, and thus > not being as open as it could be, and this does yield some discomfort - > whether that's fair or not is something of a moot point.
I don’t disagree. /K _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
