On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 12:21 PM, Georg Lukas <[email protected]> wrote: > The introduction states that "Unless explicitly noted, support for the > listed specifications is REQUIRED for compliance purposes." > > Individual sections write "To be considered [...] compliant, all line > items from the core compliance suite above must be met, as well as all > items in this suite." > > However, the tables themselves contain columns titled "Feature" and > "Providers", and the Providers column contains multiple entries for some > features. Therefore the question arises if all "Providers" in a given > line must be implemented, or if it is sufficient to implement only one > of them.
Agreed; this definitely needs clarification. I did the initial swap over from XEP based tables to "feature" based tables and never fixed the wording. > The "Web Connection Mechanisms" "Providers" column lists "XMPP-WebSocket, > BOSH and BOSH-XMPP", but it is not clear if it's XMPP-WebSocket AND BOSH > AND BOSH-XMPP or if it's XMPP-WebSocket OR (BOSH AND BOSH-XMPP). At least for this particular example there is a footnote for this: "§ Only one of the recommended providers must be implemented for compliance. " > I'd like to see an improved vocabulary in the XEP - what are "items", > "line items", "providers" and "features" - do we really need these > terms? Do you have suggestions for alternative terms? —Sam -- Sam Whited pub 4096R/54083AE104EA7AD3 _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
