* Sam Whited <[email protected]> [2016-08-13 19:56]: > At least for this particular example there is a footnote for this: "ยง > Only one of the recommended providers must be implemented for > compliance. "
Oops, I totally missed that one :> > > I'd like to see an improved vocabulary in the XEP - what are "items", > > "line items", "providers" and "features" - do we really need these > > terms? > Do you have suggestions for alternative terms? I think that "feature" and "[feature] provider" are the two most meaningful ones of the set. If we replace all occurrences of *item with either of the above, that should improve the readability already. Then replace the last sentence of the intro with the following, and we are set: "Support for the listed features is REQUIRED for compliance purposes. A feature is considered supported if all providers listed in the feature's table row are implemented. Exceptions to this rule are marked explicitly." Georg
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
