When dealing with presence information from the standpoint of the 
privileged entity, we lose information about to whom the original 
(non-forwarded) presence was sent. This wouldn’t affect the semantics when the 
privilege is of type “managed_entity”, but when it’s “roster” it’s important to 
know when using directed presence.

        I propose that, like <message/> stanzas, <presence/> stanzas also use 
XEP-0297, so the privileged entity can extract the original ‘to’ attribute when 
necessary. I also like that it gives parity to both incoming stanzas cases, but 
that’s a fairly small concern.

-bjc
_______________________________________________
Standards mailing list
Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards
Unsubscribe: [email protected]
_______________________________________________

Reply via email to