It occurs to me, also, that even in the “managed_entity” type, the component may need to know who’s sending presence, because it may handling presence in multiple roles, and so even there, it makes sense to have the stanzas use XEP-0297.
-bjc > On 29-Aug-2016, at 10:12, Brian Cully <[email protected]> wrote: > > When dealing with presence information from the standpoint of the > privileged entity, we lose information about to whom the original > (non-forwarded) presence was sent. This wouldn’t affect the semantics when > the privilege is of type “managed_entity”, but when it’s “roster” it’s > important to know when using directed presence. > > I propose that, like <message/> stanzas, <presence/> stanzas also use > XEP-0297, so the privileged entity can extract the original ‘to’ attribute > when necessary. I also like that it gives parity to both incoming stanzas > cases, but that’s a fairly small concern. > > -bjc _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
