On 9/9/16 8:15 AM, Goffi wrote:
Le vendredi 9 septembre 2016, 09:00:48 CEST Sam Whited a écrit :
On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 4:18 AM, Goffi <[email protected]> wrote:
> but the bad side is that it is not XML, so a client would
> need a specific parser (the basic information are not difficult to parse
> though).
I'm unsure of the state of this, but it may be worth a look:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6321
(although it's probably easier to use normal iCal format because many
libraries already exist to prase it)
—Sam
Oh thanks, didn't knew about it, it may make more sense in XMPP context.
So I'm not sure now which version suit the best, I actually think
standardised XML version make more sense.
If we go this way would it be better to do a new XEP and deprecate the
former one or to update the XEP-0097? I think a new one would actually
be better.
Yes, I think that would be the right path.
Peter
_______________________________________________
Standards mailing list
Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards
Unsubscribe: [email protected]
_______________________________________________
