Le vendredi 9 septembre 2016, 16:15:08 CEST Goffi a écrit : > Le vendredi 9 septembre 2016, 09:00:48 CEST Sam Whited a écrit : > [SNIP] > > > > I'm unsure of the state of this, but it may be worth a look: > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6321 > > > > —Sam > > So I'm not sure now which version suit the best, I actually think > standardised XML version make more sense. > > If we go this way would it be better to do a new XEP and deprecate the > former one or to update the XEP-0097? I think a new one would actually be > better.
Hi, I'm thinking again about this date/time thing. I see that there is already https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0149.html which define a simple start/stop using XEP-0082 which seems more simple and adapted to XMPP (there are too many informations and things that we can found elsewhere in XMPP with iCal/XCal based solutions). The current XEP-0149 is not really adapted for being used everywhere (it uses shim), so maybe a new XEP using the same mechanisms would be nice. Also I note that there is not "date" field in data form, I think this is really missing. What do you think, would it make sense to do a simple time period XEP using start/stop instead of doing a XCal/ICal thing ? I'm thinking about many use cases, but mainly events and announces (e.g. "the server will be down for maintenance between XXX and YYY). Goffi _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
