On 18 Oct 2016, at 10:31, Guus der Kinderen <guus.der.kinde...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 18 October 2016 at 11:18, Kevin Smith <kevin.sm...@isode.com> wrote: >> >> On 18 Oct 2016, at 10:16, Guus der Kinderen <guus.der.kinde...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > On 18 October 2016 at 11:12, Kevin Smith <kevin.sm...@isode.com> wrote: >> >> On 18 Oct 2016, at 10:09, Guus der Kinderen <guus.der.kinde...@gmail.com> >> >> wrote: >> >> > I don't have much of an argument other than the obvious: both affect >> >> > data 'after-the-fact'. Concerns raised against one should likely also >> >> > be tested against the other - it's pretty much the same thing. As for >> >> > the non-IM case: that could also apply to 'correction' of data, rather >> >> > than only deletion. Implementation-wise, it'd make sense to combine >> >> > both efforts too, I'd say. >> >> >> >> I agree with all of this, but believe these are distinct operations that >> >> deserve distinct protocol. >> >> >> > Why, when the use case, business rules and security considerations are >> > pretty much the same (or perhaps: should be pretty much the same)? >> > Wouldn't it be enough to perhaps have a distinct operation identifier in >> > the same protocol? >> >> I don’t see a difference between "different protocol" and “the same protocol >> with different identifiers”. If it’s which XEP number this goes into, I care >> much less than that I don’t think deletion should be an edit to zero length. > Not sure if I get what you're trying to say. I don't think that deletion > should be an edit-to-empty, I think we're in agreement there. > > When defined in distinct XEPs, I think both XEPs would be (or should be) near > copies of each-other, which would be needlessly complex. > > I propose to have one XEP, that defines distinct keywords for 'correction' > and 'deletion'. A reference to the original message is desirable for a > correction for many of the same reasons as it is desirable for a deletion.
I don’t have strong feelings on merging the XEPs versus not. /K _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org _______________________________________________
