On 10/01/2017 14:27, Dave Cridland wrote:
On 10 January 2017 at 13:30, Kevin Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
On 10/01/2017 12:05, Steve Kille wrote:
I have just issued a PR for MIX version 0.6.4.
There is clear desire to have the option for MUC and MIX to use the same
domain. The difficulty in achieving this was incompatible disco
results.
This version has made a change to
add node='mix' to channel disco that will enable the queries to be
disambiguated.
I haven't been able to think of a case other than disco#items on the room
JID where MUC and MIX are likely to collide. This change doesn't make it
*easy* to implement both on the same domain, but I think it makes it viable
- please shout if anyone can think of other cases.
I agree. Further, I only know of a single client that would ever hit
disco#items on a room, and that's Psi in its generic disco "browser".
Are you suggesting that this approach isn't necessary, and it'd be
sufficient to 'break' disco#items handling for MUC-only clients?
/K
_______________________________________________
Standards mailing list
Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards
Unsubscribe: [email protected]
_______________________________________________
