On 10 January 2017 at 14:37, Kevin Smith <kevin.sm...@isode.com> wrote: > > > On 10/01/2017 14:27, Dave Cridland wrote: >> >> On 10 January 2017 at 13:30, Kevin Smith <kevin.sm...@isode.com> wrote: >>> >>> On 10/01/2017 12:05, Steve Kille wrote: >>>> >>>> I have just issued a PR for MIX version 0.6.4. >>>> >>>> There is clear desire to have the option for MUC and MIX to use the >>>> same >>>> domain. The difficulty in achieving this was incompatible disco >>>> results. >>>> This version has made a change to >>>> add node='mix' to channel disco that will enable the queries to be >>>> disambiguated. >>> >>> I haven't been able to think of a case other than disco#items on the room >>> JID where MUC and MIX are likely to collide. This change doesn't make it >>> *easy* to implement both on the same domain, but I think it makes it >>> viable >>> - please shout if anyone can think of other cases. >>> >> I agree. Further, I only know of a single client that would ever hit >> disco#items on a room, and that's Psi in its generic disco "browser". >> > Are you suggesting that this approach isn't necessary, and it'd be > sufficient to 'break' disco#items handling for MUC-only clients? >
I'd not thought of this approach, but I was considering advocating "just break". I think this means we don't have to. > > /K > _______________________________________________ > Standards mailing list > Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards > Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org > _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org _______________________________________________
