Mon, 23 Jan 2017 07:12:17 -0000 "Steve Kille" <[email protected]> wrote:
> I don't think this is right. And what about you previous statement: > There would be a definite elegance in "using PubSub" everywhere, and > an early MIX version was written this way So you failed to build "elegant" solution and you don't think I'm right? > PubSub and MIX are both key XMPP services and have distinct > characteristics. Key? There is not even MIX yet. And pubsub usage is very limit at the moment. > PubSub is a useful building block for MIX and can also be a useful > building block for other XMPP services, such as FDP (XEP-0346) Yeah. If you build something which cannot be reused without ad-hoc elements (and thus ad-hoc code) you can always say "it's a building block". _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
