XEP-0207? On 22 Jan 2017 19:31, "Stephen Paul Weber" <[email protected]> wrote:
> I have a question about <https://xmpp.org/extensions/x > ep-0369.html#usecase-user-message> > > Doesn't using <message type="groupchat"> defeat the purpose of building on > / re-using PubSub? Why have this extra special case as a way to publish > items, instead of using normal publish? And using type=groupchat seems to > also necessitate a custom <jid xmlns="xmlns='urn:xmpp:mix:0"> to indicate > the item publisher. > > <https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0369.html#concepts-pubsub> says " MIX > uses standard presence and groupchat messages to provide an interface to > the MIX service that does not expose PubSub protocol for many of the more > common functions" -- but wouldn't "exposing PubSub" simplify everything > (only one protocol to support instead of more)? If MIX were > backwards-compatible with MUC at either client or server level, I would > understand keeping some warts, but since both client and server support is > required to use it at all, why not clean up everything while we're at it? > > -- > Stephen Paul Weber, @singpolyma > See <http://singpolyma.net> for how I prefer to be contacted > edition right joseph > _______________________________________________ > Standards mailing list > Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards > Unsubscribe: [email protected] > _______________________________________________ >
_______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
