* Ruslan N. Marchenko <[email protected]> [2017-02-13 19:30]: > >As there was no consensus two years ago, I just added both elements to > >0280 in https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/382 > > Thanks for clarification, but then still, why two? if <private/> is still > required to avoid bump, why not to stick to that? Especially if, as it was > pointed out in referenced thread - they have different semantic, but XEP > expects them to provide same outcome within specification/implementation.
As I wrote earlier, the discussion did not lead to a consensus. Adding both was an attempt to get it moving again, or at least to create a state with the widest possible compatibility. My personal stance would be: discard <private/>, reference 334, be done with it. However, that would probably require a namespace bump. Georg -- || http://op-co.de ++ GCS d--(++) s: a C+++ UL+++ !P L+++ !E W+++ N ++ || gpg: 0x962FD2DE || o? K- w---() O M V? PS+ PE-- Y++ PGP+ t+ 5 R+ || || Ge0rG: euIRCnet || X(+++) tv+ b+(++) DI+++ D- G e++++ h- r++ y? || ++ IRCnet OFTC OPN ||_________________________________________________||
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
