If you don't like the intention, then PGP is probably the way to go for you.
MAM is used to sync messages in OMEMO. Its unorthodox, but still totally valid.
Am 25. März 2017 12:49:21 MEZ schrieb Evgeny Khramtsov <[email protected]>:
>Sat, 25 Mar 2017 11:48:56 +0100
>VanitasVitae <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> But that's intended
>
>Well I don't like this intention.
>
>> If you want to search through your messages, the only way is to do it
>> in your local archive
>
>Then there is a little point in MAM, because you still need to keep
>a local copy.
>
>> The UX is relatively independent from the protocol I'd say
>
>I would disagree. The "trust" is a fundamental property of all
>crypto stuff, they don't work without trust. But a user doesn't
>understand this (probably due to poor UX): s/he doesn't understand what
>are all these fingerprints/QR codes for. Browser developers have learnt
>that and don't ask a user about trust anymore.
>
>> QR codes are already a step in the right direction
>
>Not that much, users will still be puzzled, imho.
>_______________________________________________
>Standards mailing list
>Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards
>Unsubscribe: [email protected]
>_______________________________________________
--
Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail gesendet.
_______________________________________________
Standards mailing list
Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards
Unsubscribe: [email protected]
_______________________________________________
