2017-05-27 16:49 GMT+02:00 Dave Cridland <[email protected]>: > On 27 May 2017 at 15:48, Daniel Gultsch <[email protected]> wrote: >> 2017-05-27 16:41 GMT+02:00 Dave Cridland <[email protected]>: >>> You think Zom will introduce OMEMO? I seriously doubt that's possible >>> in the current state of affairs. >> >> I'm not in contact with with the Zom developers. I don't know what >> their plans are. I just noticed there is a branch [1] and some issues >> on their issue tracker indicate that there is at least basic support >> for OMEMO (in that branch) >> >> cheers >> Daniel >> >> [1]: https://github.com/zom/Zom-Android/tree/dev_omemo > > Well, that's precisely the kind of legal problem Remko predicted > earlier, then, surely?
INAL. I presume when ever they distribute Zom w/ OMEMO it'll automatically be GPLv3? However this is not really relevant to the discussion since they are currently implementing siacs-OMEMO and not ODR-OMEMO. ODR-OMEMO can be implemented without using GPLv3 code. _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
