On 27 May 2017 at 16:00, Daniel Gultsch <[email protected]> wrote: > 2017-05-27 16:49 GMT+02:00 Dave Cridland <[email protected]>: >> On 27 May 2017 at 15:48, Daniel Gultsch <[email protected]> wrote: >>> 2017-05-27 16:41 GMT+02:00 Dave Cridland <[email protected]>: >>>> You think Zom will introduce OMEMO? I seriously doubt that's possible >>>> in the current state of affairs. >>> >>> I'm not in contact with with the Zom developers. I don't know what >>> their plans are. I just noticed there is a branch [1] and some issues >>> on their issue tracker indicate that there is at least basic support >>> for OMEMO (in that branch) >>> >>> cheers >>> Daniel >>> >>> [1]: https://github.com/zom/Zom-Android/tree/dev_omemo >> >> Well, that's precisely the kind of legal problem Remko predicted >> earlier, then, surely? > > INAL. I presume when ever they distribute Zom w/ OMEMO it'll > automatically be GPLv3? >
I appreciate these issues do not affect you, but you could at least accept they're relevant for others. There was an entire thread about this earlier. > However this is not really relevant to the discussion since they are > currently implementing siacs-OMEMO and not ODR-OMEMO. > ODR-OMEMO can be implemented without using GPLv3 code. With what library? Dave. _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
