On 30.05.2017 23:33, Daniel Gultsch wrote:
> 2017-05-30 16:02 GMT+02:00 Dave Cridland <[email protected]>:
>> (I'm open to adding a subelement to indicate that, but I can imagine
>> that might cause problems). Instead, that reason is currently derived
>> from the entity delaying.
> 
> I took me a while to fully understand and appreciate what you are
> proposing here and I actually think that's the better approach.
> This way we could - if we wanted to - even tell a CSI delay apart from
> a SM delay.
> 
> That subelement could be in the namespace of the XEP that adds it.
> I'm fairly certain that this shouldn't cause problems for any half way
> decent implementation.

+1

- Florian


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
Standards mailing list
Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards
Unsubscribe: [email protected]
_______________________________________________

Reply via email to