2017-05-30 16:02 GMT+02:00 Dave Cridland <[email protected]>: > (I'm open to adding a subelement to indicate that, but I can imagine > that might cause problems). Instead, that reason is currently derived > from the entity delaying.
I took me a while to fully understand and appreciate what you are proposing here and I actually think that's the better approach. This way we could - if we wanted to - even tell a CSI delay apart from a SM delay. That subelement could be in the namespace of the XEP that adds it. I'm fairly certain that this shouldn't cause problems for any half way decent implementation. cheers Daniel _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
