Am Mittwoch, den 31.05.2017, 20:35 +0200 schrieb Remko Tronçon: > To be honest, I still think it'd be suboptimal. It may be suboptimal for you in your unpublished implementation, but the alternative would be more than suboptimal for all the already deployed implementations.
> It would make the XEP still dependent on a single (liberal) reference > implementation, in a single language. In successful cases like X3DH/DR it is usually not a "single" implementation but the first one of more to come. It also isn't a "reference" implementation. XEdDSA has a spec in the public domain. > I'd much rather depend on standards that are widely accepted and > available, That's the thing with innovation. You just can't stay forever on DES ;) > to give OMEMO the broadest chance of implementation and deployment. It's not like we have to give OMEMO a chance. It is looking pretty good already.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
