Hi, > "Remko Tronçon" <[email protected]> wrote: > On 31 May 2017 at 20:26, Chris Ballinger <chrisballinger at gmail.com> wrote: >> What if instead of all this, we just funded a liberally licensed XEdDSA >> reference implementation and got it audited? > > To be honest, I still think it'd be suboptimal. It would make the XEP still > dependent on a single (liberal) reference implementation, in a single > language. I'd much rather depend on standards that are widely accepted and > available, to give OMEMO the broadest chance of implementation and > deployment.
Seriously? I thought your problem is that you don't like (I guess for license reasons) the libsignal implementations. How can you argue there is still a dependency on a *single* library, when the proposal is to fund another library that suits your requirement. If this helps standardization, I'd happily help funding an audit and/or help with implementation. Ignat ---- Von: [email protected] Bis: "XMPP Standards" <[email protected]> 31.05.2017 14:37:43
pgpMPxwIcNx8i.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
