On 21 Jun 2017, at 18:03, Daniel Gultsch <[email protected]> wrote: > > 2017-06-21 18:58 GMT+02:00 Daniel Gultsch <[email protected]>: >> I think the meaning of that compromise is overstated. >> The main reason for doing this is that we have a stable version which >> can be addressed and linked to (old versions are archived) while >> development of the XEP continues. The consensus has been that people >> want to make OMEMO into something that goes far beyond what it is now. >> That's fine. But this will take time. And it will also invalidate the >> audit. That why I want - during the ongoing development of the XEP - a >> note on top of the XEP that says. 'Hey you might have heard that OMEMO >> got audited and widely implemented. But that's only true for version >> 0.3 (insert link here). We are actively working on making this XEP >> even more awesome (see below) but if you are looking for the audited >> and widely implemented version look at version 0.3' > > Forgot to mention this: The alternative would be not to link the > warning to a version in the attic but to link to a XEP hosted on my > personal webspace. I'm already hosting a version here: > https://conversations.im/omemo/xep-omemo.html > > I'm open to comments on whether people think hosting it in the attic > or on my own web space is the better idea here.
I think linking to a previous version saying “This version was widely deployed” seems pretty sensible to me. /K _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
