On 22.06.2017 08:45, Chris Ballinger wrote: > Unlike most of those things you've mentioned, SignalProtocol (the > protocol and reference libraries) has been extensively studied, audited, > and widely deployed to billions of mobile devices. Other than Signal > itself (a few million users), it's in WhatsApp (1.2 billion users), > Facebook Messenger (1.2 billion users), Allo (a few hundred users), and > more. I'd guess that SignalProtocol probably has a pretty safe future > with the backing of a few multibillion dollar corporations.
Right. I can't think of a reason why someone would put OMEMO in a the corner of exotic, unstudied, and unaudited cyrpto primitives using protocols. > 2. OMEMO-NEXT would be great for supporting out of <body> experiences. Assuming that with OMEMO-NEXT you mean non-XEdDSA double ratched e2e mechanism for XMPP, then I'd like to point out that support for encryption of arbitrary extension elements (non <body/> elements) could also be incorporated in Andy's PR since it's a namespace bump anyway. - Florian
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
