On Tue, Aug 8, 2017, at 04:09, Daniel Gultsch wrote:
> That's why I suggest to explicitly limit the XEP to message stanzas
> (for now). If we in the future want to expand that XEP to more stanzas
> (and expand the rules on sanitizing fake IDs) we can remove that
> wording and bump the namespace.
This seems reasonable to me; we can always expand the XEP in the future
as new use cases arise, but we can't take features away (easily) once
they are widely deployed.
Standards mailing list