On 24 Aug 2017, at 16:56, Dave Cridland <d...@cridland.net> wrote: > Moreover, SASL2 is designed to handle a lot more than just TOTP etc - > we can merge in resource binding without any additional round-trips, > for example, if I can ever persuade Kev to see things my way. So it's > more efficient, and more incentive to get people to add SASL2 support.
I’m not at all opposed to merging bind2 into sasl2 in some sensible way. I was opposed to delaying discussing and getting a strawman out for bind2 until after we had sasl2, because I suspected sasl2 to be contentious and wanted the discussion sooner than later. /K _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org _______________________________________________
