On 24 August 2017 at 17:02, Kevin Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > On 24 Aug 2017, at 16:56, Dave Cridland <[email protected]> wrote: >> Moreover, SASL2 is designed to handle a lot more than just TOTP etc - >> we can merge in resource binding without any additional round-trips, >> for example, if I can ever persuade Kev to see things my way. So it's >> more efficient, and more incentive to get people to add SASL2 support. > > I’m not at all opposed to merging bind2 into sasl2 in some sensible way. I > was opposed to delaying discussing and getting a strawman out for bind2 until > after we had sasl2, because I suspected sasl2 to be contentious and wanted > the discussion sooner than later.
Oh, I know that. I meant you want to remove the ability to allow clients to pick a resource. I think we're all agreed on making bind2 a SASL2 thing. Dave. _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
