On 27 September 2017 at 10:09, Evgeny Khramtsov <xramt...@gmail.com> wrote: > Wed, 27 Sep 2017 08:51:48 +0100 > Dave Cridland <d...@cridland.net> wrote: > >> * We have one S2S implementation, supporting SNI. >> >> On that basis, I don't *think* we can include S2S in Final, which is >> frustrating. We probably can include C2S, but with only one >> client-side implementation it's playing a little fast and loose, I >> think, and I'd much rather see SNI support server-side to feel >> satisfied that SNI is actually covered. > > I just added partial support to ejabberd: > https://github.com/processone/ejabberd/commit/c17ec50e3a989e3d8ceb78f94ee2a7d5eec5f7d3 > > Not sure if this is counted as THE IMPLEMENTATION, because incoming SNI > is not processed (not a big deal if you have only a single virtual > host, but a problem with multi-hosting deployments).
I believe I have the right records and code running at dave.cridland.net if you'd like to try. Dave. _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org _______________________________________________
