On Thu, Oct 12, 2017, at 09:58, Dave Cridland wrote: > It's clearly not orthogonal, since simply getting rid of XHTML-IM is > not deprecating it in favour of anything else.
I didn't quite follow that. I'm suggesting we don't have to have a replacement already prepared before we obsolete XHTML-IM, which is why I think they're orthogonal. We could obsolete XHTML-IM at the next council meeting and in the mean time people could be discussing a potential replacement. —Sam _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
